Jewish Gentile Couples
Risk of Dissolution and Marital Instability Print E-mail
Written by Tuvya Zaretsky   

Marital Stability

Traditional Jewish social authorities, like rabbis, can no longer prevent intermarriage. The religious taboo against intermarriage has collapsed. Personal experience has led American Jews to realize that they can intermarry if they want. Christian society has found that the level of American individualism makes it unpopular to teach the Biblical material regarding being unequally yoked. Though the New Testament context is about business partnerships, it is clear that there is potential for spiritual disharmony when a believer in Jesus joins with another who does not share that faith. The Old Testament warning regarding taking spouses from among the heathen nations focused on the potential spiritual harm that the Israelite might endure. Nevertheless, Jews are marrying gentiles at an accelerating rate and with significant risk involved.

Studies have shown that interfaith marriages are at greater risk of dissolution than same faith marriages. A qualitative research examined the tensions experienced within interchurch marriages, where the partners came from similar but not identical Christian traditions. The partners reported spiritual challenges and threats to marriage where the differences were minimal compared to Jewish-Gentile couples. Stresses only increase where spiritual commonalties are not as natural. Religious faiths, along with differences in ethnic heritage, have been found to be a factor in marital stability and satisfaction. Social scientists are aware of the significantly higher risks of marital dissolution and dissatisfaction among partners like the Jewish-Gentile couples.

Spiritual intimacy

However tensions also rise from the inability to find spiritual intimacy as well. Marital stability and spiritual intimacy have been studied. One study found that marital satisfaction and marital spirituality both diminish dramatically when there is not mutuality of belief.  In the fieldwork for this study, I found that couples often were aware of the longing for intimacy in their relationships while not grasping that a significant cause was the inability to share spiritually. Couples are at even greater risk of relational failure when they do not know the source of the tensions.

Within Judaism, the answer to the problem of spiritual intimacy is conversion of the non-Jewish spouse. However, that solution is to the mutual exclusion of any other personal faith. The Christian response is the unique salvation in Jesus. However, since the holocaust, Christians are more aware that Jews regard conversion to Christ as mutually exclusive with Jewish identity. A way to a new community must be demonstrated for both spouses, where the answer is not either/or, but both/and. Spiritual intimacy is only possible when both partners are able to share a common faith in God, without having to disregard their different cultural identities. I suggest that such a resolution of the tensions is possible through a mutual faith in Christ while respecting the cross-cultural differences in the marriage partners.

Identity of Children

Another serious threat to intermarried couples is tension over how to raise the children. In qualitative research I found this to be not just a common concern, but most often the greatest. Jewish partners want to maintain the Jewish heritage of the children. This is traditionally understood as mutually exclusive with any faith but Judaism.

A doctoral study at USC examined how intermarried parents choose the method for religious training of their children. The most common plan was the delegation of the training to one spouse exclusively. That process resolved the tension of a two-religion family, but it did not address the issue of bi-cultural identity and neglected the faith of the other partner’s family.

Spiritual intimacy is important for family identity and marital harmony. A strategic approach is needed for evangelistic ministry to intermarried partners and among dual-identity children. It should be able to embrace the cultural heritage of both parents, while advocating a mutually satisfying spiritual solution for both parents and their children. A both/and answer is needed.

Comments
Add New Search
+/-
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
Home
About Us
Resources
FAQ's
Life Stories
Discussion Forums
Spiritual Harmony
Contact Us

Featured Article Archive

  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
prev
next
More in: Interfaith Blogs

E-Newsletter Sign-up

Name:
Email:


Community Login

Recommended Books

Quotables

I would say after 28 years of a "cross cultural" marriage there simply is no spiritual harmony. It has for me, been like being in a marriage by myself. With loving respect I would counsel anyone contemplating this sort of union to consider strongly 2 Corinthians 6:14.

That being said, I believe for those of us who did not heed God's guidelines, should stay in our marriage and believe God to display His mighty work (Romans 8:28).

More on Finding Spiritual Harmony...